Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Pot Halloween-Scare is a Monstrous Lie



What better than a good scare for Halloween 2016? We’ve got it in Orlando. Never mind Halloween Horror Nights at Universal, SeaWorld’s Halloween Spooktacular, the Spooky Empire Horror Convention, or even Mickey’s Not-So-Scary Halloween Party at the Magic Kingdom. Orange County Sheriff Jerry Demmings held a news conference on Monday October 24th with the express purpose of frightening the wits out of Central Floridians with the alarm that “Marijuana-laced candy might”…MIGHT…”be put in trick-or-treat bags for Halloween”. Not that they would, just that they might. And here’s the really neat trick. It’s all because medical marijuana could be legalized on November 8th, fully a week after Halloween.


So a proposed constitutional amendment that hasn’t passed yet, although it's pretty certain it will, is the cause for all the alarm by Sheriff Demmings. When politely asked for examples of when and where children had received marijuana-laced candies…even in states where marijuana is legal, Demmings couldn’t offer any. He admitted that “even though the potential for the marijuana edibles appearing this year may be somewhat minimal, it is still a threat in our community.” Yes, just like the threat to our community of being gunned down by rogue police officers or having an engine fall off of an airliner on the approach to OIA and killing someone. Possibility equals actuality in Demmings playbook. But is Sheriff Demmings going to protect us from either of those two possibilities, as well? Of course not!  
It's better to scare the voters with fictional pot-laced candy horror stories.

            Demmings also added this dire warning “I believe the passage of the amendment could be problematic and would negatively impact the overall public safety of our community.” How will its passage on November 8th harm the kids on October 31st? Do the pot candy pushers have a time machine to go back over a week from when medical marijuana is legalized on November 8th, or sometime thereafter, with reams of the now-legal pot-infused candy to foist on unsuspecting kids?
But drug warriors like Demmings insist it's better this way.

            Tellingly, this whole Chicken Little press conference was hosted by the anti-medical marijuana group “Don’t Let Florida Go to Pot”, a sky-is-falling local group from Pine Hills that claims, without any evidence, that people in other states are putting edible marijuana in packages that look appealing to children. Demmings called these phantasms that are packaging the pot candies in other states “mean-spirited people” who are just trying to “create confusion and injure our children.” Demmings finally made the claim that Colorado is where kids might have gotten the pot edibles while trick-or-treating. The Associated Press had reported on an incident in 2014…yes, two years ago…where eight kids in Colorado ate some pot brownies, but it turned out to be a case of bad parenting at an adult party where the brownies were left right where the kids in the house could find them. None of the kids got them while going door to door. That was the only incident the Associated Press found. Marijuana was legalized in the state in 2012. If it was such a danger, one would think there would be hundreds of stories like that by now. There are not.

The HELL with saving him...we've got to defend the kids who are not being offered pot.

            But why let the facts get in the way? It serves Sheriff Demmings anti-drug agenda, (where Orange County is enriched by continuing its drug war efforts) better by scaring everyone with an imaginary monster than to admit his concerns are baseless.


Sunday, October 09, 2016

On Your Knees for Trump





While watching CFN13 our local cable news outlet in early October 2016, a segment was aired about how leading conservatives, fearing a lower voter turnout in Florida on November 8th, are launching an evangelical campaign called “Face Down 40”. It’s intended to reawaken the religious right by praying, fasting, and then voting for Donald Trump for president. Face Down 40 takes its name from people bowing their heads in supplication for the 40 days leading up to the general election.
 

If prayer works, and social conservative and Face Down 40 organizer Pam Olsen claims it does, why has whoever they are praying to let come it to this, begging for his attention just 40 days before the vote? This seems to be a rather uncaring and capricious being on whom they are wasting their breath. What is He waiting for? Pam Olsen revealed how much she trusts prayer to work when she says "If we go back to sleep again (as she thinks Christians did in 2008 and 2012), just like we've done so many times, then we're in trouble and it's on us.” So what good is praying? If just two of you Christians pray for something, doesn’t Matthew 18: 19-20 where it says “Again, I tell you truly that if two of you on the earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by My Father in heaven. For where two or three gather together in My name, there am I with them,” guarantee it will happen? I have read numerous Christian responses to this piece of scripture, all claiming that it is taken out of context. Read the paragraphs before and after it. What caveats does Jesus impose? “Anything you ask for, it will be done for you…” There is no “but only if you do this, this, and this first”, or "it only applies to the most holy among you.” Christians use those excuses to get themselves out of a hole they’ve dug themselves into.


 
            Over a year ago, when the Republican field was crowded with 17 candidates, no less than four of them; Scott Walker, Rick Perry, Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz. all claimed divine inspiration to run and made it clear God favored them and wanted them to be president. What happened? The most unsavory character of them all, Donald Trump, is who Pam Olsen and her evangelical cohorts are now praying for to win. She is actually praying for a man who, in what he whimsically called locker-room banter, talks about grabbing women by the crotch, that he wanted to f*ck a woman he was not married to when he had only recently married third wife Melania, and "when you're a star, they let you do it”. As president, would Pam allow him to grope her crotch, or have sex with her while her husband was away - because he’s a star? If her answer is no, why would she support, and encourage others to support, such a person? Olsen claims Trump’s conversions on key social conservative issues is genuine and deserving of evangelical support, yet she offers not one shred of evidence that it is genuine or that he has converted. Sort of like her support for Christianity on not one shred of evidence that the bible is true.

 
        Pam simply wants to believe it, and she wants evangelicals on their knees for the next 40 days praying that this misogynistic, sexist, dishonest, shallow, and crass XY chromosome carrier attains the presidency. Why would this god they are praying to offer up a candidate who is so lacking in everything the evangelicals stand for? This man has been married three times, has claimed he didn’t need a god’s forgiveness, has called women dogs, pigs, fat slobs, bimbos, and disgusting animals, supported abortion right up until he became a Republican candidate (before then, he was a registered Democrat), claims he could shoot someone and not lose voters, and has unashamedly claimed “it doesn’t really matter what they write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.” Any man of God would do the same, wouldn’t they, Pam? You would no doubt be flattered if Trump told everyone - in front of your church - that you are a “piece of ass”.
       At least his final word there accurately describes you, Pam.


Uh, um...praying and communion....that's what he means!

Sunday, September 25, 2016

The Fallacy of Voting for the "Lesser of two Evils"


The following is a blog written in October 2012 by Jon Rappoport, a former candidate for the 29th Congressional District in California and Pulitzer Prize nominee. His observations are even more succinct four years later.

For decades, disaffected Americans have been trudging to the polls and voting for the lesser of two evils. That’s how they register their preference for a presidential candidate.
Choices based on that dubious strategy seem to work for the short-term (at best). But in the long run, the law of diminishing returns sets in.

Term after presidential term, the lesser of two evils lowers the quality of life for everyone and keeps nudging the decline of the American Republic. The hole to dig out of becomes deeper, and successive presidents—each one the lesser of two evils—are less capable and willing to do the necessary digging.
That’s the story of leadership in America.
But prompted by new and more desperate created crises, citizens resort to the “lesser” strategy every four years, believing they must.

“I’m not that enthusiastic about either man, but I have to choose one. I have to go with the lesser of two evils because this country is in real trouble.”
Where does it stop? “Look, this time, I’m picking the lesser of two evils because the national crisis is so terrible. But next time, I promise I’ll do something else.” Really? What else will you do? Hope the sun comes out?

The voter who is chronically addicted to the lesser of two evils is like a man in debt who borrows to pay it off. Each time he borrows, the debt gets bigger. He says, “I know this is crazy, but what else can I do? Borrowing from Peter to pay Paul is the lesser of two evils. If I don’t do it, I’m sunk. I promise I’ll straighten this mess out—but not right now. I have a payment coming due. I have to borrow again.”

And just like the federal debt, which keeps swelling, the election of one lesser after another as the president keeps expanding the national misery. Finally, the idea that voters can step outside the two-party system to find a real president who actually believes in the Constitution seems like a pipe dream because all the prior lessers have screwed things up so badly, have sold so out badly, have trampled on the Constitution so crazily…the shell-shocked public accepts these lessers as the status quo.

At that point, people say, “Stop all this nonsense about a third-party candidate. Get real. We have to choose from the two candidates in front of us. That’s what life and elections are all about. Be an adult. Make your decision. Go for the lesser of two evils.”
A national poll might prove quite interesting. Ask people, “In the presidential election, are you voting for the lesser of two evils? Are you voting for the candidate who is “less bad” than the other guy?”

Better yet, let’s have a candidate who says, up front, “Hi, I’m Gil Fulbright, the lesser of two evils, and I’m running for president. Let’s not kid each other. You know, I know, and everybody knows that my opponent and I are both morons and sell-outs. We got where we are by lying and stealing. What else did you expect? We’re both puppets for larger forces. But at least I’m willing to admit it. And I believe, in my heart, that I’m the lesser of two evils. What do you say? Cut me a break. I really want to live in the White House and be the commander-in-chief. And my wife? Don’t get me started on what she wants.”

So the next time a “smarter, wiser” friend, who “really knows how the world works,” tells you you’ve got to choose the lesser of two evils, realize who’s smart and who the idiot is.

This fake political ad for Gil Fulbright is an example of what you get from voting for the lesser of two evils. Copy and paste address below in Google search.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQTqB5jZ4Lc


Politicians won't change if they know we'll vote for them anyway. Good candidates seldom receive the support they need to become viable. The problem of bad choices are thereby perpetuated, and the nation's political process continues to deteriorate until the day when our choices will be an Adolf Hitler or a Joseph Stalin.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Liars for America - An Olympic Dream

America's new Mount Rushmore of Olympic Liars

No apologies…none…there will be no mea culpa from Ryan Lochte and the three other U.S. swimmers at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. Know why? Because of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, that’s why! If it’s good enough for presidential candidates to never own up to a lie, why should it be any less for Gold Medal winning U.S. Olympians?

Donald wouldn’t apologize for being an American and neither should these world class  liars…uh, that is, athletes. Only losers apologize. Only someone who recognizes and practices right from wrong apologies. These classic American swimmers represent the best of America. The America that Donald Trump wants to make great again and that Hillary believes she is entitled to lead. We’re not great until we have athletes who can kick any other country’s ass in the pool, then kick the ass of the host countries gas station attendants who think their private property is somehow off limits to inebriated American Olympians. All the guys wanted was some respect, even if they were too drunk to understand what that was. Only security guards armed with loaded weapons put the brakes on the whole episode. And that’s just wrong. It is certain these Americans are better than Brazilians, because, you know…the Olympics. And they just won Gold. They have a right to make up any story they want explaining themselves. If they choose to blame the Brazilians for holding them accountable, who can blame them for pulling a story right out of their ass(es)?
Olympic Gold Medalists show host country why U.S. is better

Lochte understands, based on listening to Donald Trump and/or Hillary Clinton that he owes nothing to anyone for pissing outside a restroom, vandalizing the facility, and fighting against those attempting to prevent the swimmers from leaving the crime scene. Because those Brazilians may have become some of the rapists and drug runners Trump warned us about in 2015, or that might have read some of Hillary’s unsecured emails and provided that information to ISIS. Sure, some of them may be good people, but actually, Donald was talking about Mexicans, not Brazilians so never mind. We don’t know who read Hillary’s emails, so we can conjecture that it may have been these Brazilians, who, in a moment of sympathy for radical Islamic terrorists, supplied ISIS with some trivial nonsense that they could later claim was a reason to blow someone up. See what Hillary’s unsecured server could lead to?
If their mouths are open, they're lying.

Ryan Lochte has lost his endorsement from Speedo thanks to this misunderstood episode, but as the saying goes, when one door closes, another one opens. It may be that he won’t need Speedo’s tainted money anyway. Both Trump and Clinton will need a speech writer, and given their penchant for playing fast and loose with the truth, Lochte will be the right person in the right place at the right time...an Olympic liar with the job of making two of the worst candidates for president look Abe-Lincoln-honest in comparison. Talk about an Olympic task!
...including lying!

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

God Abandons Holy Land


God has abandoned the Holy Land!

On the front page of the July 20, 2016 edition of the Orlando Sentinel is an article entitled “Holy Land will sell off Items amid financial troubles”. I wonder, why don’t the employees and even TBN honchos who still own the park pray away the debt?  Christians always insist that God listens to, and answers, all prayers…then quickly add the caveat that maybe “God’s answer is no”. But why would the biblical God ignore any appeal to keep Holy Land financially lucrative, especially when the whole purpose of the park is to lend legitimacy to the claim that the Bible is the word of God, that He is the one true heavenly father of Jesus and the actual universe-creating deity? Either the Holy Land promotes the wrong god, or He doesn’t exist.
Begging for dollars

While it may be presumptive to claim God has forsaken his flock at the Disneyesque biblical theme park in Florida’s capital for slightly tacky, money-fleecing pseudo-entertainment venues, the Sentinel reports the Holy Land is drowning in a sea of red ink. And it’s getting worse year by year. 
Jesus and the Holy Land...both are bleeding to death.

One would think Christians, who get hard ons over watching a mock flogging and execution, would flock to the place by the millions and money would never be an issue…on the debit side, that is.
The wisdom of the Profits...uh, Prophets.

The park is being forced to sell off gaudy furniture, costumes, ornate statues, even a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. (I think in the Holy Land Experience version, Jesus arrives in Jerusalem on a bike, not an ass.) And TBN is also closing retail stores selling cheap Holy Land trinkets in Tennessee and California. In the coming months, I suspect they'll have to further auction off anything that's not nailed down. So don't worry, Jesus on the cross is safe for now.
Where the hell did all our money go?

But reading between the lines it’s apparent that, with the death of Jan Crouch last May, the big-haired, gasping gargoyle who was the theme park’s major financial backer, the Holy Land just can’t stay on its feet no matter what they do. There is only so much bullshit you can force on people before they reject it. Just ask the former Soviet Union.  
The rat hole near the mouse hole, south of Orlando.

Paul and Jan Crouch bought the theme park with TBN money in 2007 and propped it up with their cheesy and tasteless telethons until 2012. But even they had to finally admit the park was just a huge vacuum cleaner that sucked away all their money.
Paul Crouch signals his feelings on further financial backing for the Holy Land Experience


So they left it up to God and Jesus to keep it open. In Their infinite wisdom, They had this to say...
...To you too, Paul...and Jan.

Sunday, June 12, 2016

Orlando massacre reaction

      
         
          For a Sunday afternoon in Orlando, it is unusually quiet. By now, normally the roads and streets are bustling, lawn mowers are humming, sidewalk joggers rush by in pairs, and there is chatter in the air; from neighborhood grill outs, get togethers, and pool parties. But today, the silence is eerie. The whole area seems to be stunned by the news that 49 people were murdered and even more injured in this morning’s shooting at the Pulse nightclub in downtown Orlando. 49 people dead! These are battlefield numbers. These are casualties that occur when at war. So this isn’t a tragedy. It’s an atrocity.
          The gunman, identified as Omar Mateen, called 911 reportedly from within the club around 2 AM with a message of support for ISIS just minutes before he opened fire. He decided, on the basis of his avowed faith in Islam, that killing people was what Allah wanted. A Texas pastor used the occasion this morning to declare the Christian god was in complete agreement. He is saying that Yahweh or Jehovah sides with Allah, and that justifies the slaughter. Would Mateen have killed if not motivated by a religious belief? Would a Christian minister have sided with an Islamic jihadist if not for his religious belief? These men are evil. They are the face of what is wrong when motivated by their holy books. When was the last time someone killed because of what they read in a Harry Potter book?
          Like that Texas preacher, a longtime FORMER friend on Facebook (who will remain nameless as I will never acknowledge them as a member of the human race again) decided to show his love and understanding of the situation this morning by quoting Galatians 6:7 from the bible: “Don't be deceived: God is not mocked. For whatever a man sows he will also reap.” When I read that, I went to his Facebook page and was astounded that he had published even more vicious, gay-bashing, and biblically-oriented rantings and ravings all in support of this mass killing. I did not bother sending him a message or ask for clarification. I immediately unfriended him. If I see him at any upcoming national meetings that we have attended together in the past, I will not shake his hand or even nod in his direction.
          This is the face of 21st century Christianity. This is what he really thinks Jesus meant in Luke 19:27 when he supposedly said “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.”

          I’ll state my reaction plainly….WHAT HORSESHIT! You, FORMER friend on Facebook, are the reason more and more people find your religion not just stupid, but wicked. And YOU are stupid and wicked for quoting it. You give the word HATE a whole new meaning. The Orlando victims did not sow death and destruction anywhere. They did not reap any godly justice for any sin. It’s like saying because people were buying fatty foods at a San Ysidro California McDonalds that James Huberty has a right to come in and gun them down on July 18, 1984…or that if you watch the movie The Dark Knight Rises, you should expect someone like James Holmes to pop in and open fire as he did in Aurora, Colorado on July 20, 2012, because clearly watching a movie or eating McDonalds food is worthy of death. And now Christian bigot, loudmouth, and homophobe Pat Robertson has claimed that this is God's judgment on our nation because same sex couples are allowed to marry. As I stated at the beginning of this paragraph...WHAT HORSESHIT!
The source of evil.

          Why did it happened? Some are already claiming that it’s the atmosphere of hate created by candidates like Donald Trump. I doubt that. I think it has more to do with holy books and people’s interpretation of what they read that led to this massacre. This is a logical extension of the Huguenot slaughter perpetrated by the Roman Catholic Church in the 1100s, the wholesale murder of Mormons by Christians in the state of Missouri in 1838, the Cave of Patriarchs massacre by Baruch Goldstein on Muslim worshipers February 25, 1994 near Hebron Israel, or the mass shooting in Peshawar Pakistan by Islamic militants at a school crowded with children on December 16, 2014. The common denominator is religion. In each case, the killers indicated god told them, through their holy books, to kill. Christopher Hitchens had it absolutely right. Religion does poison everything.

Monday, June 06, 2016

Age Ain’t A Factor – the elder aces of the Great War

You're never too old to look good next to an SE-5a

In the summer of 2013 R&B singer Jaheim’s monster hit “Age Ain’t A Factor” ruled the air waves. It was a look at why younger isn’t necessarily better and that good things come with those who have more experience. A case can be made that boldness is more pronounced and reflexes are quicker when a person is younger, but wisdom and experience only come with age. Acedom didn’t pass by the older pilots in World War One. Their experience paid off when they were right in the thick of aerial combat.
Called the 'old man' because he was 27, Rick was 6 years younger than Lufbery

Maybe it is the books produced in the U.S., skewed with a very American-centric view of the war, that many of the earliest accounts I read seemed to suggest that Captain Eddie Rickenbacker was the oldest ace of the war. One even states “At the advanced age of 27 he was two years older than the age limit for pilots but Rickenbacker proved a natural in the cockpit. Thanks to driving around General Pershing, he was able to talk his way into the Air Service, receive flight training and then ended up in command of the USAS 94th Aero Squadron finishing the war with 26 victories and the Medal of Honor.”
Major Raoul Lufbery rates as the USAS combat pilot with greatest age experience

The whole idea is strange because one of the oldest combat pilots in the USAS was the man ordered to command Rickenbacker’s 94th, Raoul Lufbery, a 17 victory ace who was born March 14, 1885, making him 33 when he and Rickenbacker first met. So Eddie wasn’t old by Raoul’s standards. Needless to say, the authors of those “America First” books were completely wrong about who was the oldest ace.

Here is the age winner, Sergeant Adolphe du bois d'Aische
   
The French can lay claim to that title for Sergeant Adolphe du bois d’Aische who was born March 17, 1874 in Brussels, Belgium. He served with the French Air Service and was 43 when he achieved acedom as a gunner aboard a variety of French observation and bombing aircraft, from the unusual Salmson-Moineau SM.1 and Letord 1A3 multi-place aircraft, to the Farman F.40 and Sopwith 1A2 two-seaters. After achieving 6 confirmed victories, and also having 6 probables, he did fly a single seat SPAD VII but was injured in a crash before he was able to take it into combat.

This is representative of what Marine Field Units looked like in 1917

The German’s oldest ace was Leutnant zur See Heinrich Wessels, a naval pilot with Marine Feld Jasta 1 who attained 6 victories. He was born April 18, 1877 and was 41 when he died from his injuries in combat on September 16, 1918.

2nd Lt. Henry Evans Cope
The Royal Flying Corp’s oldest ace was 2nd Lieutenant Henry Evans Cope, born in London on July 26, 1879. He was raised in Canada but returned when war was declared. He was an observer in Maurice Farmans, became a pilot and flew DeHavilland DH-2s with 24 squadron where he attained 5 victories. He was 37 when he was killed by anti-aircraft fire while on a morning patrol September 3, 1916.
Oberst Adolf Heyrowsky
Austria-Hungary’s oldest ace was also their top two-seater ace, Oberst Adolf Heyrowsky, born February 18, 1882. He finished the war with 12 victories flying mostly Hansa Brandenburg and Lohner two seaters.

Major Pier Ruggero Piccio 
Italy’s oldest ace was Major Pier Ruggero Piccio born September 27, 1880. With 24 victories during his career, he was the third highest scoring Italian ace, behind only Major Francesco Baracca and Tenente Silvio Scaroni. He was 38 when the war ended and was lucky that he wasn’t killed on his final mission when he was shot down on a ground attack sortie October 27, 1918. He was briefly captured but slipped away a week later as the Austro-Hungarian forces disintegrated.

Russian ace Eduard Pulpe's photo when he was a teacher before the war
Russia’s oldest ace was Eduard Martinovich Pulpe, born June 22, 1880 in Riga, Latvia which at the time was part of the Russian Empire. He was a rarity, a college graduate who went to France and became a pilot. He was 34 when the war broke out and immediately joined the French Air Service where he achieved 2 victories flying a Morane Saulnier L in 1915 and 2 more flying Nieuports in 1916. In May, he returned to Russia, became a pilot with the 10th Fighter Detachment of the IRAS flying Nieuport 11s and scored his 5th victory over Galicia in July. He was killed in combat on August 1 or 2, 1916 (records vary) at the age of 36.

France’s Adolphe du bois d’Aische beat the odds on several levels, not just becoming the oldest ace of the war but outliving the oldest of all the other counties. He passed away at the age of 84 in 1958.
Sgt. Adolphe du bois d’Aische receives the Croix de Guerre.

These men proved that age wasn’t a factor and while most of them gave the last full measure and died far too young, they left their mark in the halls of history. So do not regret growing older. It is a privilege denied to many. 

d;Aische, on the right, ready to go on patrol in the three place Letord 1A3


Author's note: because records were incomplete, I did not include any Turkish pilots in this list. According to the fragments left, Oberleutnant Ali Riza scored 3 victories, but there was a possibility that he attained two more in Mesopotamia, making him potentially Turkey's only ace.
Oberleutnant Ali Riza

Saturday, May 28, 2016

JFK Assassination fallout - Liars-in-Chief

What if...?

          May 29, 2016 marked the 99th birthday of John F. Kennedy. He probably wouldn't have lived that long but the history of the past 53 years would be vastly different if he had not been murdered. Thanks to his assassination we have been cursed with a parade of Liars-in-Chief holding the highest office in the land.
          When the American people allowed whoever it was that killed JFK to get away with his murder, the killers and those who supported them realized they could lie to us and we wouldn’t do anything about it.  
          I prefer to say things up front. John F. Kennedy WAS killed by a conspiracy, and the people who carried it out are still being protected by elements within our government…the FBI, the CIA, and the military. Lee Oswald didn’t kill anyone on November 22, 1963…not Tippit and not Kennedy. However, he has been vilified since then as the lone nut assassin. He was silenced by Jack Ruby so that the blame could be pinned on him without any recourse or anyone challenging it. He was exactly what he shouted in the halls of the Dallas Police Department, “I’m just a patsy”.  

The liars saw it and said that it was good.

          Are you satisfied with the course our country has taken since November 22, 1963? Kennedy’s death led to one liar after another holding the office of presidency. If any of these men had been Pinocchio, there wouldn’t have been enough wood available to keep extending their nose. Look at just a few examples of each:
None of these men would have become president if JFK had not been assassinated

          Lyndon Johnson will forever be remembered as the liar who pushed the Gulf of Tonkin resolution which was used to justify the American military buildup in South Vietnam and a war that killed over 58,000 U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, nurses...and over a million Vietnamese.
          Richard Nixon lied about a secret plan to end the war in Vietnam to get elected, then illegally invaded Laos and Cambodia while lying to cover it up…and lied about virtually everything else until he resigned.
          Gerald Ford lied about what was in the Warren Commission testimonials. He knew the truth because he was ON the commission but still lied to protect the predetermined solution to the murder...that Oswald was the sole assassin.
          Jimmy Carter lied about being a “nuclear physicist and a peanut farmer.” He was neither: he held only a bachelor’s degree, and he owned a peanut warehouse.
          Ronald Reagan's lies started before he even got into office. Remember his famous “There you go again” line to Carter at the debate on October 28, 1980? Carter had just accused Reagan of being against Medicare and Social Security. Carter was right and Reagan was wrong, Reagan had recorded a record album in the 1960s opposing Medicare and Social Security because he claimed it was leading us down a socialist path. But Reagan got away with it because he got a laugh from the line. He also lied about the illegal war in Nicaragua that he initiated, the Iran-Contra deal, his environmental policies…the list goes on.
          George H.W. Bush – remember “read my lips, no new taxes”? He then passed the biggest tax increase in our nation’s history to that date. Also, unlike 99% of Americans alive then, Bush says he can't recall where he was the day Kennedy was shot, (even though there’s a picture of him standing outside the Texas School Book Depository that afternoon). I guess CIA agents don’t need to have reliable memories.
George H.W. Bush chats with other CIA and FBI agents while police sweep the TSBD.

          Bill Clinton lied about his numerous extra-marital affairs; even going so far as to try to redefine what “is” is during the run up to possible impeachment proceedings. Of course, when smoking pot, he didn't inhale, either.
          George W. Bush – lied about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and dragged the U.S. into two wars.
          During a Joint session of congress in 2009 discussing health care reform, Barak Obama said: "There are also those who claim that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false – the reforms I'm proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally." In a breach of decorum South Carolina congressman Joe Wilson pointed at Obama and shouted, "You lie!" twice. But Wilson was right. Numerous cases have turned up where illegal immigrants had no problem getting on the Affordable Care Act. Obama even got MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber to identify the American voters as stupid people for passing the act. Not a lie per se, but a serious misjudgment.
          This is what our chief executives regularly pull off because it has become "part of the job"..  
          In November 2013 CNN even did a story about how and why presidents lie: http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/24/politics/presidents-lie/
          As if that makes it okay.

If the president's lips are moving, he's lying.

          Lying now defines American politics and presidents. They consistently lie because the U.S. government, to this day, continues to lie about the Kennedy assassination. Lying did not start there; it just became accepted and expected from that point on. It set a precedent that the liars in our government continue to build on.
          As long as we let the assassination lies and the liars who maintain it continue to rot American history and politics, our image around the world will sink lower and lower. We used to be considered “a shining beacon on a hill”. Now, thanks to lies that justify numerous wars we initiated or expanded since the JFK assassination, allow or encourage rampant CIA intrusions into foreign affairs, kill countless people the government gets to define as “bad”, and show callous disregard for the rights of other people or nations, we are the bully on the block...the rich, drunken, quarrelsome doofus that no one trusts.

      Are you pleased with what the U.S.A. has become?

          Then do something about it, because we are about to hold an election where we’ll have to choose from two more proven liars for the presidency.
They move in the same circles when they're not running against each other.